NEW DELHI: Cricket Australia‘s chief, Nick Hockley, has termed South Africa’s decision to send a second-string side to New Zealand for Tests as a “wake-up call.”
This move sparked criticism from players and officials alike, prompting discussions about scheduling clashes and the importance of prioritizing international cricket.
South Africa’s choice to reserve key players for the SA20, starting from January 10, led to a weakened squad for the two-Test series in New Zealand scheduled from February 4 to 17. The decision raised concerns about the balance between T20 leagues and international Test cricket.
Hockley, addressing the issue, stated, “That’s been a wake-up call for everyone. The role of T20 [in] bringing new kids and new people into the game can’t be underestimated. The belief is that the two can coexist. This was suboptimal scheduling.”
Cricket Australia has consistently advocated for Test series comprising a minimum of three matches, particularly as part of the World Test Championship (WTC). The clash between T20 leagues and international commitments has highlighted the need for better coordination and scheduling.
Hockley emphasized, “I do think there is work to be done on the FTP (Future Tours Programme) going forward, and it’s really [about] cementing the World Test Championship, [and] really advocating for three-Test series as an absolute minimum.”
While recognizing the financial challenges associated with Test cricket, Hockley stressed the importance of supporting countries where the revenue from T20, ODIs, and Tests may not align.
He noted, “The challenge is the economics. There are parts of the world where the revenue from the T20, ODI and a Test are the same, yet the costs of putting on a Test are significantly higher.”
The cricketing landscape continues to evolve, and discussions around scheduling and player priorities are likely to shape future decisions to strike a balance between the thriving T20 leagues and the traditional format of Test cricket.
(With inputs from PTI)
This move sparked criticism from players and officials alike, prompting discussions about scheduling clashes and the importance of prioritizing international cricket.
South Africa’s choice to reserve key players for the SA20, starting from January 10, led to a weakened squad for the two-Test series in New Zealand scheduled from February 4 to 17. The decision raised concerns about the balance between T20 leagues and international Test cricket.
Hockley, addressing the issue, stated, “That’s been a wake-up call for everyone. The role of T20 [in] bringing new kids and new people into the game can’t be underestimated. The belief is that the two can coexist. This was suboptimal scheduling.”
Cricket Australia has consistently advocated for Test series comprising a minimum of three matches, particularly as part of the World Test Championship (WTC). The clash between T20 leagues and international commitments has highlighted the need for better coordination and scheduling.
Hockley emphasized, “I do think there is work to be done on the FTP (Future Tours Programme) going forward, and it’s really [about] cementing the World Test Championship, [and] really advocating for three-Test series as an absolute minimum.”
While recognizing the financial challenges associated with Test cricket, Hockley stressed the importance of supporting countries where the revenue from T20, ODIs, and Tests may not align.
He noted, “The challenge is the economics. There are parts of the world where the revenue from the T20, ODI and a Test are the same, yet the costs of putting on a Test are significantly higher.”
The cricketing landscape continues to evolve, and discussions around scheduling and player priorities are likely to shape future decisions to strike a balance between the thriving T20 leagues and the traditional format of Test cricket.
(With inputs from PTI)
